Christianity Today August 7, 2026 6 min signal 2026-08-07

Can the left and the right tell their right from their left?

Archived text mirror, captured for personal reading when the Signal ran. Formatting is approximate — read the original at the source.

Christianity Today

August 7, 2026

- Facebook

- X

- WhatsApp

- Telegram

Illustration by Christianity Today

This piece was adapted from CT’s books newsletter. Subscribe here.

Stephanie Slade, Fusionism: Liberty, Virtue, and the Future of the American Right (University of Notre Dame Press, 2026)

In her new book, Stephanie Slade dusts off the idea of “fusionism,” which defined American conservatism for decades but has been near forgotten and long neglected in today’s bruising era of politics. Slade, herself a devout Catholic and libertarian, defines fusionism as the marriage of the Judeo-Christian moral tradition and classical liberalism. For years, conservatives held that virtue fused with liberty is essential for a well-ordered society and human flourishing. No longer, Slade holds. In a time when both sides of the aisle have become enamored with big, bold government, fusionism has fallen out of favor.

Slade charts the rise, influence, and aims of what she terms the newly ascendent Dissident Right with concern. This cohort is eager to crack up what they view as the faulty foundations of yore, and in their place erect a new politics built on grievance through whatever means necessary—aided by a more forceful government. This Dissident Right is eager, Slade details with depressing but manifest detail, to leave liberty, virtue, and at times even the Constitution behind in furtherance of its project.

Thanks for signing up.

Explore more newsletters—don’t forget to start your free 60-day trial of CT to get full access to all articles in every newsletter.

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

At only 270 pages, Fusionism is a well-oiled machine of a book. Both the writing and the content hum smoothly along. With colorful storytelling and a depth of research that testifies to her journalistic background, Slade reintroduces readers to the central casting of American conservatism’s theorists, philosophers, and prime movers—and their contributions, internal spats, and influences on the conservative project at large. (She does the same, more briefly, for the Dissident Right.) She occasionally references the progressive left but avoids sensationalism and maintains a clinical tone. Her prevailing concern is with her own camp of conservatives, and her clear-sighted analysis makes it hard to disagree with her conclusions. Those concerned about the health of the American political right will find plenty to ponder in Fusionism.

Marc J. Dunkelman, Why Nothing Works: Who Killed Progress—and How to Bring It Back (Public Affairs, 2025)

Why does the same America that once sent a man to the moon struggle to do things like build high-speed rails or housing adequate to its population’s needs? Why, in one instance in San Francisco, did it take years—and over a million dollars—to construct a single public bathroom?

Marc J. Dunkelman, a political historian at Brown University’s Watson School for International and Public Affairs, has a finger to point—and it’s at those of his own political persuasion. Dunkelman is a Democrat, and Why Nothing Works is his decidedly wonky, unapologetically progressive take on how his party has contributed to the gridlock and dysfunction in American politics.

Dunkelman contends that conservatives deserve a measure of blame for the current state of affairs, but he nearly always steers back to reminding his (presumably progressive) readers of the left’s culpability—and therefore responsibility. He also traces a direct line from incompetent liberal governance to the embrace of Donald Trump, whom he said would be curtailed if people had confidence that their government truly worked, and worked for them. Progressives must strive for a government that, well, works. Otherwise, Dunkelman warns darkly, conservative populism will only continue to grow.

Within the heart of progressivism, Dunkelman describes, lie dueling impulses that date back to America’s founding. The movement’s Hamiltonianimpulse seeks to build up a powerful government to do great things for the greater good. But the movement’s Jeffersonianimpulse wants to do the opposite: decentralize, distribute power, and equip people with the tools that will allow them to protect themselves from a corrupt elite.

Often, the Jeffersonian impulse came on the heels of the casualties of a Hamiltonian era, as Dunkelman notes in the case of Robert Moses’ engineering of New York City. And the predictable result of these flip-flops? A stalemate, plus a lot of wasted money and effort besides. Many people can say no, from neighbors who don’t want development to environmentalists concerned about the impact on wildlife. Meanwhile, nobody can actually say yes.

But Why Nothing Works is weakest when it comes to solutions. Even readers desirous of change may be skeptical of Dunkelman’s vision: Presidential administrations past and present have done little to inspire confidence that concentrated power will be wielded discretely or in a way untainted by fallen human nature.

Still, readers at odds with Dunkelman’s progressive bona fides (or his conclusions writ large on a host of topics, from abortion to the role of the judiciary) may still find his take on where progressivism has gone wrong interesting. However, the book’s dry, dense style makes it less approachable than some other recent offerings in the same genre.

Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America (1835)

It seems ironic in the year of America’s semiquincentennial to recommend a book not initially meant for an American audience at all. Yet Democracy in America, written by a young French aristocrat for his fellow countrymen, has long merited a place in America’s foundational canon of influential political works.

Alexis de Tocqueville’s tour de force on America is something of an anthropology of the still-young democracy. The political scientist drew upon nine months of crisscrossing the United States for his book. In it, Tocqueville seems to wed the observational skills of a beat reporter with the sweeping political analysis of an Edmund Burke. Tocqueville describes America’s strengths and foibles, drawing on vivid vignettes of people he encounters.

Tocqueville’s portrait of American society is at times so unfamiliar as to give force to the line “the past is a foreign country,” but he very often describes a silhouette that—however blurred the feature—still boasts a recognizable outline. Americans’ ambitious natures, individualism, disdain for class, and even original sin are all seen through fresh eyes by Tocqueville. Despite the occasional section that has aged poorly, Democracy in America allows Americans to experience being tourists to their own history—quite as fine a 250th birthday gift as any country is likely to receive.

Harvest Prude is national political correspondent at Christianity Today.

- More from Harvest Prude

- Facebook

- X

- WhatsApp

- Telegram

### Conservative Politics in Revolutionary Times

Harvest Prude

### Are Christians Rude Dinner Guests?

Harvest Prude

### Decoding the Supreme Court

Harvest Prude