A rare bipartisan opportunity to protect unborn lives
Legislation to improve prenatal well-being stalled in Congress, but Arkansas and Maryland launched new assistance for pregnant women and their babies.
!Image 1: A pregnant woman with pink and blue dollar bills.
Christianity Today June 11, 2026
Illustration by Elizabeth Kaye / Source Images: Unsplash
Last month the state of Arkansas, at the direction of Republican governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders, launched a new prenatal and pregnancy health program through a network of Arkansas Health Units. In an effort to improve prenatal health and reduce infant and maternal mortality, the state is now offering prenatal care and education at little or no cost to Arkansas women.
Sanders is a pro-life Republican, and her state of Arkansas has already banned most abortion. But government-funded prenatal care is a rare pro-life cause that has bipartisan appeal.
A few days after Sanders’ announcement, Maryland Democratic governor Wes Moore announced a new cash-assistance program for low-income expectant mothers in the state that is designed to improve maternal and child health.
Sign up for The Daily Briefing
Get the most recent headlines and stories from Christianity Today delivered to your inbox daily.
Email*
Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.
“Welcoming a child is a moment of joy, but for many Marylanders, starting or growing a family can come with economic challenges that impact long-term health and stability,” an official at the Maryland governor’s office said.“Providing new parents with cash that they can use for everyday needs like groceries, rent, and baby supplies is proven to promote long-term economic mobility and lead to improvements in overall health.”
Abortion is legal in Maryland, and the Democratic governor supports that. But his goals in supporting healthy pregnancies align with those of many pro-lifers.
Expanding health care for low-income pregnant mothers has been a goal of much of the pro-life movement for more than 50 years. In the late 1960s and early 1970s, state pro-life organizations including Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life and the North Dakota Right to Life Association endorsed it.
Some pro-life organizations ignored or forgot about these proposals after the Supreme Court’s _Roe v. Wade_ decision in 1973.
_Roe_ is now overturned, but the number of abortions has increased. In this new political environment, pro-life organizations are once again supporting legislation to reduce the expense of pregnancy and expand health care for pregnant women, with the goal to improve prenatal health and remove financial barriers that deter some low-income women from choosing life for their unborn children.
recommended
Forty-one percent of women who have abortions have family incomes below the federal poverty line, with 30 percent more classified as low income. Most already have one child and don’t think they can care for another. Eighty-seven percent are unmarried—which means most are already single mothers and especially likely to be poor. One study showed 40 percent of women who had abortions cited financial concerns as a reason.
Pro-lifers therefore have good reason to think that reducing the cost of childbearing for low-income pregnant women will save some unborn lives. Initiatives that reduce prenatal and infant mortality are also clearly pro-life.
That’s why last year two groups, Americans United for Life and Democrats for Life of America, both endorsed the bipartisan Supporting Healthy Moms and Babies Act, designed to make private insurance companies eliminate out-of-pocket costs for prenatal care and childbirth and provide postpartum medical care for up to a year after a child’s birth. Senators Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and Tim Kaine (D-Va.), who support legal abortion, joined with pro-life senators Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Ms.) in sponsoring the legislation.
“Americans shouldn’t have to choose between starting a family and being strapped in debt,” Rep. Young Kim (R-Calif.) said when endorsing the bill. “Rising living costs on top of excessive hospital and health care fees after giving birth deter individuals from becoming parents.”
Despite bipartisan support, the Supporting Healthy Moms and Babies Act failed to get out of committee last summer. Congress has shown little interest in it since.
But the actions taken during the past month by the governors of Arkansas and Maryland suggest a bipartisan path to accomplish at the state level what the Supporting Healthy Moms and Babies Act might have achieved across the United States.
Pro-life and pro-choice politicians who disagree about whether abortion should remain legal can nevertheless unite on policies that will improve the health and economic well-being of pregnant women and their babies. Those initiatives can save unborn lives even in states where legal restrictions on abortion are not politically possible.
Daniel K. Williams is an associate professor of history at Ashland University and the author of_Abortion and America’s Churches_.[](https://www.christianitytoday.com/2026/06/a-rare-bipartisan-opportunity-to-protect-unborn-lives/)
Our Latest
Wire Story
Bethany Christian Will No Longer Allow LGBTQ Parents to Foster and Adopt
Kathryn Post - Religion News Service
The move comes amid a broader shift at the largest Christian adoption agency to “reinforce” its Christian identity.
 Paid Content
Paid Content for Gloo
A Force for Flourishing
How Technology Helps the Faith Ecosystem Expand Its Collective Reach
Nationalism Can Be Prophetic
Kazusa Okaya
Born in the 19th century, church leader Kanzō Uchimura critiqued his country’s growing militarism out of his love for Jesus and Japan.
The Bulletin
Tribalism, Cancel Culture, and Loving the Enemy
Why tribalism has taken over modern discourse, and how Christians can respond differently
News
Christians Debate Drugs vs. Discipline in the Age of Ozempic
As GLP-1s become widely used for weight loss, Christians are split on whether they’re useful medications or spiritual shortcuts.
News
How Do You Run a Special Needs Camp? With a Lot of Help.
Christian camps for kids with disabilities must mobilize small armies of volunteers every summer. Now some must also adapt to new regulations.
Wire Story
Southern Baptists Move Closer to Constitutional Ban on Women Pastors
Bob Smietana - Religion News Service
Messengers at the church’s annual meeting easily passed a measure barring churches with women pastors or those that allow women to preach. The change must pass again next year to become permanent.
The Just Life with Benjamin Watson
Sam Acho: From the NFL Gridiron to Eradicating Food Deserts and Modern Slavery
The deeply rewarding work of trading worldly success for justice-centered kingdom living.