About 100 cities have deactivated cameras, rejected deals, or canceled their contracts with Flock Safety, according to the crowdsourced count kept by the activists who organized the campaign. Denver is one of them. It then signed a one-year deal with Axon to put license plate readers back up — a company that holds several multimillion-dollar contracts with the Department of Homeland Security. The residents who forced the Flock cancellation had objected to Flock data reaching immigration enforcement. NPR reported the swap on Saturday.

The DeFlock movement is winning the vote it put on the ballot and losing the one it meant to. What a city council cancels is a vendor. The capability is a line item that outlives the vendor, and the industry has now watched a hundred councils prove it.

What a city council cancels is a vendor. The capability is a line item that outlives the vendor.

The numbers are not ambiguous. There are more than 130,000 automated license plate readers deployed across the country — that figure comes from DeFlock.org, the opposition's own database. Axon told investors on its most recent earnings call that agencies are switching to it from existing readers, and credited its "controls and privacy work" for the win. Flock's CEO, Garrett Langley, says the company will add seven times the number of customers it lost this year. Both companies are describing the same market, and in that market the backlash reads as churn.

Andrew Ferguson, the George Washington law professor who wrote the book on self-surveillance policing, points at the part nobody is protesting: the real-time crime centers that pull facial recognition, gunshot detection, drones, and predictive policing into a single console. Those raise far more red flags than plate readers alone, and they have drawn almost no organized opposition. The EFF's Matthew Guariglia explains why in one line — once you know what a Flock camera looks like, you notice how many there are. The campaign is calibrated to what is visible from the sidewalk. The next thing the industry sells will be a database schema.

Canceling is not nothing, and the strongest version of the argument for it is specific: Flock's shared national index is the actual defect. A department running local cameras on a short retention window is genuinely different from one plugged into a nationwide search surface where a Texas deputy can query a car that has never left Colorado. That distinction is real, and Flock conceded it — last week it announced shorter retention and new safeguards around local searches. But the concession is the tell. The ACLU called the changes largely unsatisfying, which is the correct read: reforms of that shape are the price of keeping the camera on the pole, and the company paid it without hesitating. Denver paid a steeper one. It objected to ICE and bought from a DHS supplier.

The sharpest description of what happened came from the man being displaced. Langley, asked about Denver, said he scratches his head at it.

I guess in some ways I scratch my head because that company works with ICE.
NPR

He is an interested party and he is also correct. A movement that can strip a hundred contracts and not one camera has found the edge of what a procurement fight can buy. The cameras were never Flock's. They were the department's, and the department is still shopping.